Monday, 21 July 2008

Liverpool BNP and freedom of speech debate in the Liverpool Echo.

On numerous occasions the Liverpool Echo has printed letters from Liverpool BNP members, which in turn has resulted in some debate. Credit must be given where it is due and we would like to thank the Liverpool Echo for standing by its latest claim that it stands up for freedom of speech, which was in its Thursday, July 17th, 2008 edition. Even though in the said article the Echo has stipulated that it is reviewing their policies regarding the British National Party. We hope the Liverpool Echo will continue to respect the fact that we are a legal political party that believes in democracy and an important part of democracy is being able to voice different opinions, so that the electorate can make an informed choice. It is the responsibility of the electorate to decide on the views of a political party not an individual or organisation.



One of our candidates for the Belle Vale ward, Pete Molloy, had a letter printed in the Liverpool Echo on 9th July, 2008. The letter had been edited and we can only assume this must be due to lack of space available on the Echo’s letter page. Here are the two versions along with the Liverpool Echo article.



Original Letter:-



This New Labour government has proven once again with Harriet Harman’s Equality Bill that they have turned their backs on white working class British males, which was once the party’s core support base. If evidence was ever needed for this, then all you need to hear is the praise by this New Labour government for imported cheap migrant labour.



New Labour would say it is “positive” discrimination to aid women and ethnic minorities to help find employment as well as better their career aspirations. However, this so called “Equality” Bill is in fact racial and gender discrimination against white British males no matter how much spin Ms Harman would like to put on it. Even when Ms Harman was approached and informed that this Bill could discriminate against white males, she is quoted has saying “You don’t get progress if there isn’t a bit of a push forward”. Is it any wander that many white working class males have withdrawn their traditional support from a party that they thought they had a voice with to seek alternative representation.



Increasingly over the many years, I have felt that if you belong to the group of people that I belong to, which is a straight, single, working class, white British male, that you are becoming more disenfranchised by this New Labour Government. New Labour has made this group of people the lowest of the low in their own homeland. It was because of having a lack of a voice in the political correct feminist driven Labour Party, which was one of the reasons why I left the party in 2006 and joined the British National Party (BNP).



We in the BNP believe that irrespective of a person’s gender or racial origin, if they are born in Britain then they are automatically at the front of the employment queue and that person should be employed solely on merit and not their gender or race. The government as no right to dictate to the private sector whom they can and can’t employ.



One must ask where all this New Labour’s social engineering policies will end. Will they dictate to pub landlords that a certain percentage of their patrons will have to be women and from ethnic minorities before they can trade? Will they try and dictate to people what the demographic make up of their social group will be before they leave their homes to socialise? They have already dictated to the British public that we are to be part of a Soviet style European super state by ratifying the Lisbon Treaty with out a mandate from the British public. Therefore, any thing is possible with this anti-British New Labour government.



Liverpool Echo version:-



So-called equality

THIS New Labour government has proven once again with Harriet Harman’s Equality Bill that they have turned their backs on white working class British males, who were once the party’s core support base.

New Labour would say it is “positive” discrimination to aid women and ethnic minorities to help find employment as well as better their career aspirations. However, this so called Equality Bill is in fact racial and gender discrimination against white British males no matter how much spin Ms Harman would like to put on it.

Even when Ms Harman was approached and informed that this Bill could discriminate against white males, she is quoted has saying: “You don’t get progress if there isn’t a bit of a push forward.” Is it any wonder that many white working class males have withdrawn their traditional support from a party that they thought they had a voice with which to seek alternative representation.

We in the BNP believe that irrespective of a person’s gender or racial origin, if they are born in Britain then they are automatically at the front of the employment queue and that person should be employed solely on merit and not their gender or race. The government has no right to dictate to the private sector whom they can and can’t employ.

P. Molloy, Childwall

Liverpool Echo Article 17th July 2008

The ECHO will stand up for freedom of speech

FREEDOM of speech is the cornerstone of a democratic society but when does one person’s right to express their views infringe another person’s liberty?

Opinion expressed on our letters pages last week caused consternation for some readers.

A LETTER from P. Molloy of the British National Party (ECHO, July 9) prompted anger in some quarters.

Reader Tom Jenkins from Walton wrote: “I find it abhorrent that my local newspaper would print material from a fascist organisation. The leader of the BNP, Nick Griffin denies the Holocaust ever happened. He was convicted of race hatred in 1998 for publicly stating these views.

“Molloy states that jobseekers should not be discriminated against due to their racial origin but then states that those born in Britain should be at the front of the job queue.

“Such glaring contradictions are commonplace among the BNP as they try to present themselves as reasonable members of society.

“There is no place for the vile hatred of the BNP in our city.”

Readers may recall the court case in November 2006 when Nick Griffin (pictured), leader of the BNP, was cleared of stirring up racial hatred.

In his summing up Judge Jones said: “This case is not about whether the political beliefs of the BNP are right or wrong. We live in a democratic society which jealously protects the rights of its citizens to freedom of expression, to free speech.

“That does not mean it is limited to speaking only the acceptable, popular or politically correct things. It extends to the unpopular, to those which many people may find unacceptable, unpalatable and sensitive."

The ECHO believes in freedom of speech but not in inflammatory statements.

We are currently reviewing our policies with regard to the BNP and other similar organisations.

Liverpool BNP would like to add that our Chairman, Nick Griffin, has never been convicted of denying the holocaust, not least because it is not an offence under British law.

He was, in the last century, very critical of the way in which the real suffering and mass murder of the Jews of occupied Europe has been exploited by mainly aethiestic gentile leftists as a moral club to stifle criticism of mass immigration.


He long ago expressed regret that the language used upset some individual Jews, as, in the post-9/11 world, the free peoples of the West and the Jews need to bury past quarrels and stand together against the threat of Islamic imperialism.

No comments:

Post a Comment