Wednesday, 15 June 2011

Recent Wigan BNP meeting fiasco

This is what I hope is a taster of the madness and lunacy that was spouted by the current BNP hierarchy at the recent Wigan BNP meeting. There is, was a lot more than this and I hope much more is uploaded. The lunatics are definitely in charge of the BNP at the moment, this is why its imperative to get rid of Mad Nick Griffin.

Monday, 6 June 2011

Nick Griffin dying a thousand deaths

Must watch video's of Nick Griffin the sole architect and man, with no honour, responsible for the BNP's destruction, digging a hole for himself. A lunatic with no answers to any questions running and ruining the once mighty and proud BNP.

He was slaughtered on Question Time and here he is/was slaughtered by his own BNP membership!

The final two minutes on video two with the stand off between him and Eddy Butler are sensational.



Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Why the British Freedom Party was Founded

by George Whale and Michael Wood


In Britain, the chasm between mainstream political opinion on the one side, and public opinion on the other, now gapes so wide that not even the staunchest party supporters can any longer skirt around it. Tim Montgomerie, editor of the ConservativeHome website, best summed up the situation in a BBC radio interview a while back:

I think there are a huge number of issues now where the main political parties in Parliament all think the same – Europe, the war in Afghanistan, prisons, climate change – there’s a whole range of issues where the public may have different views from the MPs but no mainstream party represents them.

The roots of the liberal consensus in Parliament and public estrangement from politics may be deep and tangled, but perhaps part of the problem is the remoteness of today’s professional politicians from normal life. Addressing the specific issue of immigration, newspaper columnist Peter Hitchens – old-fashioned Tory and fierce critic of the party’s leftward lurch under David Cameron – recently commented:
… the modernised Tory Party, just like its New Labour twin, actively favours large-scale migration. Rich young careerists in pleasant parts of London – who form the core of all our establishment parties – couldn’t function without the cheap servants and cheap restaurants that immigration brings.

Not for them the other side of immigration – the transformation of familiar neighbourhoods into foreign territory. Not for them the schools where many pupils cannot speak English, and the overloaded public services. Not for them the mosque and the madrassa where the church and the pub used to be.

Searchlight report

A report published 28 February 2011 by the Searchlight Education Trust confirms the existence of a substantial – hitherto all but invisible – section of the British electorate comprising people who are worried about the nation’s continuing transformation, but find themselves politically disenfranchised, stranded between the mainstream parties and those at the nationalist fringe.

Fear & Hope describes a survey carried out by polling organisation Populus, who asked 5,054 people 91 questions on faith, ethnicity and national identity. Billed as “the most systematic study of contemporary attitudes to race, identity, nationhood and extremism available in England”, it found that:

• the English are sceptical of multiculturalism and deeply resentful of mass immigration
• they fear extremist Islam
• Black and Asian groups share these concerns
• negativity about immigration is linked to economic pessimism
• the British National Party (BNP) “is in decline” and there is “a limit to the potential growth” of the English Defence League (EDL)
• most people are traditional rather than “progressive”
• the vast majority reject political violence
• there is “popular support for a non-violent and non-racist” nationalist political party.

The report speaks of “an assertive nationalism”, of “a new politics built around… identity, culture and nationhood which transcends both an older class politics and even more recent debates around demographics and immigration”.

The British Freedom Party

It was in response to the need for a nationalism untainted by racialism and street violence that British Freedom was founded last year. Both of the authors of this article are members of the new party.

The party takes inspiration from popular freedom parties in Austria, Switzerland, Italy and elsewhere, but especially Geert Wilders’ PVV in the Netherlands, which with 24 MPs is poised to turn back the tide of enforced immigration, to confront Islamic militancy, and to challenge the political elites who seem intent on that nation’s destruction.

Like its European counterparts, British Freedom espouses cultural nationalism, as opposed to ethnic nationalism. We believe that national identity derives primarily from the integration of individuals and communities into an established culture, their acceptance of and allegiance to the rich set of customs, values, political procedures, laws and understandings handed down by tradition.

We know that cultural and social integration is achievable, because so many have already achieved it. Integrated immigrant communities provide the strongest evidence of the essentially cultural character of Britishness. Because for every Muslim bomb-maker or honour killer living in Britain, countless numbers of his co-religionists are working hard, learning our language and history, paying taxes, obeying the law, raising families and doing their best to fit in.

Similarly, for every chippy East London ‘gangsta’ who likes to mug white people for a living, there are countless others from the same part of town and from the same racial background who work, study, fix up their cars, take their girlfriends to the movies and play Sunday morning soccer on Hackney Marshes.
The difference between the law-breakers and the law-keepers, the hostile and the integrated, is primarily cultural. Culture and race are connected, but they are evidently separable.

A common characteristic among successful integrators is that, through immersion in our culture, they come to acquire a strongly British self-identity, a type of patriotism that is comparable, though not identical, to that of indigenous Britons – more so when family roots in this country are generations deep.
We in the Freedom Party believe that the resolution of present problems lies not in some dream of restoring Britain’s postwar racial balance (however desirable that may seem, it is impossible), but in distinguishing between destructive and constructive people and forces in society, dealing robustly with the former and strongly incentivising the latter.

Unlike liberals, we do not deny ethnicity as an important component of self-identity, national identity and historical continuity. Neither do we deny that bringing so many races together in a small island has created terrible difficulties, or that native Britons seethe with anger at the unwanted changes wrought on their communities by mass immigration. And that is why one of British Freedom’s main migration policy demands is an immediate halt to further immigration.
We define ourselves in terms of a traditional pro-Britain attitude, an attitude that informs all of our policies: economic policies that emphasise the revitalisation of industries in which Britain has traditionally excelled; agricultural, energy, environmental and defence policies geared towards national self-sufficiency and independence; crime and justice policies that seek to restore traditional practices of policing, deterrence and punishment; health policies that prioritise treatment for British citizens; and education policies that emphasise traditional competencies as well as academic freedom and rigour.

Cultural nationalism versus ethnic nationalism

Ironically, the British Freedom Party owes its existence to the anti-nationalist establishment. Under the UK’s Equality Act, which forced racial and ethno-nationalist parties to amend offending clauses in their constitution related to membership criteria and objectives, Culture is not one of the 7 grounds listed under the Act that are unlawful when used as direct or indirect discrimination. Therefore, by ramming this vexatious act through the British Parliament, the establishment opened the door to a nationalism that is potentially far more dynamic and certainly more populist than its race-centric or ethno-centric counterparts.

British ethno-nationalism is underpinned, rationalised and justified by the ‘indigenous argument’. The BNP’s one major victory was to force establishment figures, mainstream politicians and journalists to define sections of the British populace as the ‘indigenous population’, thereby recognising and legitimising core ethno-nationalist arguments, in the face of ignorant claims that the UK is a ‘mongrel nation’ – which is in itself an attempt to psychologically divorce the indigenous population from its ancestral homelands.

However, we find that most of the support for parties such as the BNP is policy-orientated, and not ideological, demonstrating that the support isn’t ‘getting their message’ and can quite easily switch over to parties that offer the same populist policies – EU withdrawal, an end to mass immigration – without any ideological hurdles.

Nick Griffin’s BNP was quick to dismiss the English Defence League as a tool of the state. This proclamation should be taken with a large pinch of salt. The BNP, prior to the emergence of the EDL, held the monopoly in the anti-Islamisation quarter. It’s no secret that Nick Griffin looked upon the rise of the EDL with jealousy, and even going as far as to suggest that the BNP resurrect the street activities that the party abandoned in the late 90s, in an effort to halt the haemorrhaging of support.
Poll results tell us that the core policies of the BNP are very popular, but when these policies are attached to the BNP name, the support falls significantly, because of the historical baggage carried by a party that has tried to change its spots over the last decade, but has failed to dispose its most high profile purveyor, Nick Griffin. Therefore, the BNP under its current leader has its national vote share ceilinged at 5%, not enough to win a single seat in the parliament which holds the key to withdrawal from the European Union.

The decline of the British National Party and the rise of the English Defence League are probably related. But for all the EDL’s noise and visibility, and its skill in mobilising sectors of the disaffected working class, it looks an unlikely candidate to rescue Britain from the triple scourge of mass immigration, multiculturalism and globalisation.

For one thing, the League is not a political party; for another, it isn’t much concerned with issues other than “militant Islam”; and for a third, it doesn’t appeal to most people, largely because of its suspected links to soccer hooliganism. Mr and Mrs Middle England – if we may so designate traditional, patriotic voters – would no more think of participating in an “E-E-EDL” chant at some raucous street rally than of inviting Nick Griffin and his twin rottweilers to Sunday lunch.

Conclusion

Britain has a proud record of defending freedom through many of the darkest periods of European history. But the systematic undermining of national self-confidence by the ruling elite has eroded our capacity to oppose the nation’s dismantling.
For us to retain our distinctive identity, which has both cultural and ethnic components, requires decisive action to stop the tide of immigration, to reverse the handover of powers to the European Union and other undemocratic, supranational interests, and to restore British values, traditions and freedoms to the centre of public life.

To achieve this requires political power, which in turn requires broad popular support. That is why the British Freedom Party welcomes patriots of all backgrounds. Our inclusiveness, in terms of class, race and age, distinguishes us from other comparable parties, for example UKIP (the UK Independence Party), which is fundamentally a single-issue party appealing to older, middle class people.
We provide common ground for all those who feel betrayed by establishment parties, for “people who strongly resent the direction their country has taken” (to borrow Colin Liddell’s phrase), including traditional Conservatives, disaffected heartland Labour voters, pragmatists from other nationalist groupings, and patriotic minorities.

British Freedom is a moderate party founded on principles of cultural nationalism. We present populist policies within a nationalist ideological framework, but without focussing on ethno-centric objectives and policies, because it’s our belief that indigenous ethnic interests are best presented by a non-partisan ‘civil rights’ organisation.

About the authors
George Whale is a research administrator and former software engineer and print specialist. He has a Ph.D. in creative cognition from Loughborough University, UK, and currently lives and works in Glasgow, Scotland.
Michael Wood is a nationalist of 10 years’ standing, and a member of the Executive Council of the British Freedom Party. He has degrees in Marine Biology, Geology and Physical Geography from Cardiff University and works as a Spokesman.

http://britishfreedom.org/2011/03/why-the-british-freedom-party-was-founded/

Tuesday, 25 January 2011

A day of BNP expulsion reinstatement's to the Party

It seems there is a lot of movement in the BNP at the moment concerning internal BNP Party position changes. Not only that, this sites contributors were contacted this morning and notified that Peter Stafford Jnr and Peter Squire's unjustified, illegal expulsions from the Party they had both served so admirably have been dropped and that they have both been reinstated as BNP members with immediate effect. Letters received below.


Above Peter Squires letter and below Peter Stafford Jnr's letter. CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE.



The contributors on this site have their own ideas as to why these reinstatement's have happened and after speaking to both Peter Squire and Peter Stafford this morning they also have their own views. Peter Squire goes on to state that there is nothing he would like more than to work alongside the newly appointed North West Regional Organiser Mike Whitby to take Liverpool BNP and the North West to new political heights, however in Liverpool there are too many irreparable damages and grudges that have occurred since the General Election last year.

Peter Squire further adds that Mike Whitby is a good sort, however events and hard line disruptive personalities currently working within Liverpool BNP will be intent on destroying any bridges that Mike Whitby will want and wish to repair. This being the case circumstances and situations because of "the lunatic BNP fringe faction", closely aligned too Mike Whitby, will make his job of reconciliation near nigh an impossible one with the more level headed,calm, moderate Liverpool BNP members.

This site however wishes Mike Whitby well in his endeavours as Liverpool Organiser and New BNP North West Regional Organiser.

Sunday, 16 January 2011

The continued sad slide of Liverpool BNP.




Having been a BNP member for over eight years, I have never before witnessed the shameful and embarrassing way that the current crop of Liverpool BNP officials and members conducted themselves and the way in which they were acting at the Oldham By Election count on Thursday 13th January. I can honestly say it’s been the first time I’ve been embarrassed to wear the BNP rosette which I have worn with so much pride in the past.

The Merseyside contingency of the BNP who were there, supposedly acting as ambassadors for the BNP colours acted more like thugs, proceeded to shout abuse at other Nationalists from other Nationalist political parties who were present at the civic hall for the By Election count in Oldham.

At one point a police officer had to caution Peter and Andrew Tierney and also Andy Leary for threatening behaviour to a lone English Democrat Nationalist, who whatever one’s views and opinions of that Party is a fellow Nationalist. Peter Tierney also tried to goad Paul Nuttal the UKIP Parliamentary candidate and current UKIP MEP, however he rose above the abuse and ignored Peter Tierney.

On more than one occasion the Liverpool BNP contingent were reported to the police by members of the English Democrats who were on the end of verbal abuse from the disgraceful behaviour of various members of the Liverpool BNP contingent. On another occasion a polling officer had to intervene when he witnessed the bullying and intimidation from a Liverpool BNP official and his very angry friend against another Nationalist. All this unravelled in front of Clive Jefferson who did nothing.

It would seem from the scenes I witnessed that members of Liverpool BNP were just there to confront other Nationalists and to behave in a manner which was well below acceptable and certainly well below what should be expected at such events at a Parliamentary count, more so as TV crews and reporters were present from all the major TV broadcaster channels.

Steven Greenhalgh who is a fully paid up life member of the BNP asked Clive Jefferson two simple questions which were greeted with aggression and sarcasm from him. Is this the way a leading official should act towards other BNP members? Having spoken to Steven Greenhalgh the questions he asked were, 1. When will Peter Squire get a date for his tribunal after he was expelled from the party for supporting Eddy Butlers leadership challenge against Nick Griffin last year, his appeal was lodged several months ago 2. Why has Clive Jefferson not responded to Steven Greenhalgh’s official complaint dated the 23rd November 2010 regarding Peter Tierney acting as BNP security by not allowing and refusing various BNP members, officials and activists, some of who were local and Parliamentary candidate’s entry to an official BNP meeting? No satisfactory response or answers came from Clive Jefferson, who just walked away whilst sweating profusely, maybe because the TV cameras were there.

Going back to the count it has to be said all the other BNP officials and representatives who were there were a credit to the British National Party. It was just the shameful actions of the Liverpool BNP contingent by their behaviour which needs to be questioned; also Clive Jefferson’s intransigence to a few polite questions was very disappointing.

A lot more could be said about the appalling actions from some members of Liverpool BNP the other night. It looks as if it’s a case though of the tail wagging the dog there with the Tierney’s destroying the group whilst they're current Liverpool Organiser willingly follows. why? Because Mike Whitby has to.

Monday, 8 November 2010

Defections to British Freedom - Onwards and Upwards!


The British Freedom Party is proud to announce that Mr. James Whittall has been appointed as Press Officer on the Executive Council of the party.
As an officer of the Executive Council and Press Officer James will be tasked with acting as the primary press spokesman for the party, being responsible for developing the party’s media image and also training regional press spokespersons in presentation and speaking skills.

James will also work with our Chairman Peter Mullins and others to develop and train the party’s public speaker list for local groups to request as speakers at party meetings.

As all those who know him are aware, James is widely regarded as the best political speaker in the contemporary nationalist movement and a man whose motivational and inspiring speeches can energise activists and officers alike. In an era of politics when the art of public speaking has been replaced by political spin, James, through his oratory has the ability to entertain and enthrall a meeting whilst simultaneously educating and motivating them politically.

James is respected as a dedicated British nationalist, and is well known in nationalist circles as a committed activist for the cause. James has stood as a Parliamentary candidate in his constituency of Shrewsbury, and his fiancee Christina Evans has stood previously as a parliamentary candidate in Ludlow. Both are tireless political campaigners with a wide range of experience in organising party members, running groups, organising meetings, running election campaigns and dealing with the media.

With both James and his partner Christina being regarded as two of our nation’s most dedicated, intelligent and committed nationalists, we know the pair of them will make a formidable team for the British Freedom Party.

Cllr. Michael Simpkins Joins British Freedom

The British Freedom Party would like to welcome our first councillor into the party, Corsham Town Cllr. Michael Simpkins.

Cllr. Simpkins, who recently resigned from the controversial British National Party, on the grounds of financial mismanagement states, “I have studied the policies of British Freedom in detail and they are clearly for the good of the whole country without being divisive or discriminatory to others.”
British Freedom’s ideology is one of cultural nationalism as opposed to the BNP’s racial nationalism.

British cultural nationalism aims to preserve and protect the culture handed down to us by our ancestors but will not rule out anyone belonging to that British culture out on the grounds of race, religion or ethnic origin.
Cllr. Simpkins added. “I can see a vacuum in British politics waiting to be filled by a party with moderate views while still wishing Britain to remain British. British Freedom ticks all the boxes for me.”

The British Freedom Party is the only political party in our ’democratic system’ that represents and promotes British values and culture.

Whilst all the other political parties regularly put their own party political interests before those of the nation and the British people, we alone represent the interests of the entire British nation. Ours is a party of national and cultural unity, not of class division or racial division. Where there is division, we will work to bring unity.

Unlike UKIP we do not want to eradicate the indigenous cultures, people and identities of the English, Welsh, Anglo-Irish and Scottish people of our islands in order to create some monstrous, politically correct artificial ’uni-culture’ based on ‘assimilation’ in order to replace our unique British national and cultural heritage.
Unlike the BNP we do not fight legal cases in order to exclude people from membership of our party on the grounds of their race. All are welcome to join the British Freedom Party as long as they are fully integrated British citizens who agree with, and abide by, our party constitution.

Unlike the Tories, Liberals and Labour we are not responsible for the tragic mess our great country is in. They alone bear the guilt for the decades of endless betrayals that have wreaked such havoc upon our nation and people.
The British Freedom Party is just over a week old.

Like all political parties, and like all growing things, there will be growing pains as we grow and develop as a political party and as a national political movement. It is a truism that there can be no growth in politics or in life without struggle.
But the fact that we are already attracting men of the calibre of Cllr. Simpkins, men who have the vision and discipline to put the cause of our country first and who will stand up and fight for what they believe in, bodes well for the future of the party. From such beginnings grow great things.

Welcome to the British Freedom Party Cllr. Simpkins.

Monday, 25 October 2010

Why A British Freedom Party?

No doubt you are one of the growing number of British people who are feeling totally disillusioned about the state of our great nation and who feel betrayed by each of the establishment political parties. So were we. That is why people just like you chose to form the British Freedom Party.

Within Britain, more and more people are becoming aware of the threat to our nation and traditional British culture from political correctness, multiculturalism and mass immigration. These problems are either encouraged by mainstream politicians, or completely ignored by them. At the same time as our British culture is being eroded and destroyed, what remains of British industry is being sold off to foreign corporations, and our national wealth is being given away in foreign aid as we close care homes for our own elderly and disabled citizens. British workers are being forced into unemployment as cheap foreign labour is imported into the country to take our jobs and young British people are being dumped onto our streets with no hope of gaining meaningful employment or securing a future for themselves. The list is endless. It looks to us as if this decimation of Britain and its way of life is deliberate.

Until now there has been no political party appealing to ‘the man in the street’ standing ready to challenge this state of affairs. There have been nationalist parties which have come and gone in the past of course, some lumbered with the baggage of financial impropriety, others which were seen simply as single issue campaigning parties and a few which propounded forms of racial extremism which repelled ordinary, decent people.

We in the British Freedom Party though are the first party to offer sensible, moderate and principled nationalist policies whilst being firmly determined to reverse the wrongs of the past forty years.

We are not alone. All over Europe people are waking up to the destruction of their nations, which is being engineered primarily by the European Union. The people of the Netherlands under Dutch MP Geert Wilders, have formed a Freedom Party which looks set, very soon, to become Holland’s ruling party. In Bulgaria, Austria, Switzerland, France, and Italy, similar freedom parties are also beginning to evolve into mass populist movements, ready to turn back the tide of enforced immigration, to challenge the corrupt political elites within their own governments and to prevent the destruction of their sovereign nations.

The British Freedom Party is proud to be part of this new Europe wide movement of national freedom and democracy, and we are proud to join the struggle against the common enemy we all face as nationalists and patriots. That enemy is the European Union and its political puppets in all the mainstream political parties who do its bidding.

The process of closer European integration is geared to generating a global system of government in which nations and their cultures are cast aside. The European Union actively demands the dismantling of our national borders, that we allow the free movement of foreign workers into Britain and the removal of our laws that seek to protect our national culture. Actions and policies of this nature were once labeled as communism, or even further back, Nazism. It is our aim to restore power back to the British Parliament so that the British people can once again live in a free country, where democracy and the rule of law ensure we remain a free people in perpetuity.

Britain has historically, kept the light of Freedom burning throughout the dark periods of European history. We are rightly proud of our nation’s record in fighting totalitarianism and tyranny, but so successful have the politically correct elite been at undermining our British identity and restricting our fundamental right of freedom of speech, that the British people are now being cowed into submissiveness and silence, even as our nation is being dismantled and destroyed. Fortunately, people like you remain to challenge these elites. The British Lion can still roar.
We are also proud of the fact that all our principle officers are ordinary people, and not members of the corrupt political establishment. Our Chairman, Mr. Peter Mullins is an retired RAF Vulcan aircrew operator, whilst our Executive Council is run by people who have lived and worked in the real world, as opposed to being ‘professional’ politicians who are more interested in making money for themselves than serving the interests of our great nation and people.

WHAT IS OUR MISSION?

Our mission is to reverse the catastrophic wrongs inflicted by successive governments of all political persuasions upon our nation and people over the last forty years. We work on the principle of Cultural Nationalism and strive to create a Britain and a British people unified in defence of our freedom, democracy and culture. We aim to unite all our people in order to save our nation. You will have, attached to this document, our constitution and policies, so there is no need to detail those here, but the reason those policies were drafted was, in the first instance, to create a party that could be trusted by everyone and that put its members in a position whereby they could challenge the leadership if they felt things were not being done properly. Secondly, they were drafted to ensure that, when it comes to the governance of our nation, our policies have the necessary element of fairness coupled with a determination to re-create wealth and industry, jobs and futures, for all our citizens. We intend to work, not for our own financial benefit, but for the benefit of our nation, our people, and their children and grandchildren. No officer or member of this party will ever stand accused of ‘doing nothing’ or profiteering whilst our nation drifted into corruption and decay.

For too long has the lion slept and Britannia wept.

We have much to do, but if you join us you will be fighting alongside us on the moral high ground of patriotism in defence of our freedom, democracy and culture, secure in the knowledge that you are fighting for the very survival of our nation and people’s future.

http://britishfreedom.org/